Rising Brazil: The Choices Of A New Global Power
What should we expect from a newly powerful Brazil? Does the country have the capacity and leadership to be a central actor in addressing critical global and regional problems?
A Daily Publication of The Dialogue
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva defeated incumbent President Jair Bolsonaro in Sunday’s runoff election to return to Brazil’s presidency, which Lula previously held from 2003 to 2010. The victory, by a margin of fewer than two percentage points, capped a stunning political comeback for Lula, who was imprisoned for 580 days in 2018 and 2019 after being convicted of corruption and money laundering. To what can Lula attribute his victory, and what will be the most significant changes he will make as president? How likely are Bolsonaro—and his supporters—to accept defeat? How well will Lula be able to work with Brazil’s Congress, where Bolsonaro’s supporters increased their representation in this year’s legislative vote? In what ways will Bolsonaro continue to influence Brazilian politics?
Peter Hakim, member of the Advisor board and president emeritus of the Inter-American Dialogue: “Brazil’s political drama continues. Act I ended with Lula’s election, albeit by an unexpected, ultra-slim margin. Act II now starts with Bolsonaro’s reaction. We were forewarned that he might not acknowledge defeat—and Lula’s narrow victory makes it easier to claim, Trump-like, that the vote was stolen and refuse to surrender the presidency. While some important allies have accepted the result, Bolsonaro retains the loyalty of many other political leaders. And he remains capable of inciting protests across Brazil. So far, the country’s institutions have shown a significant measure of resilience, however. Many state and local governments, for example, rejected Bolsonaro’s indifference to the pandemic. The Supreme Court and the Electoral Tribunal will refuse any demands to rerun the election. Still, if police, who are mostly in Bolsonaro’s camp, are unwilling or incapable of controlling potentially massive and violent demonstrations, the Brazilian military may be pressed into action. They could either end the turmoil and pave the way for Lula’s presidency, or call for another election. How this plays out is unknown. But the two months prior to the official inauguration date could well be a time of enormous tension and uncertainty. Assuming Lula is inaugurated on Jan. 1, Act III will follow, illuminating the immensely difficult challenges facing his administration. The new president will confront a hostile Congress led by Bolsonaro supporters. The economy is predicted to decline sharply next year. Much of Lula’s presidency will have to be dedicated to repairing the damage of Bolsonaro, including the gutting of national institutions in such crucial areas as the protection of the Amazon and the environment generally, education and research, as well as the rights of women, Indigenous groups and Afro-Brazilians (who are half Brazil’s population). Lula needs to restore his country’s trust in government, even among his own voters, and temper the nation’s extreme polarization. He must also rebuild Brazil’s reputation as a serious, competent and trustworthy partner across Latin America and worldwide.”
Joel Korn, president of WKI Brasil and senior international partner at UPITE Consulting Services: “President-elect Lula’s narrow victory was possible primarily by a very high disapproval rating of President Bolsonaro’s far-right autocratic government and potential threats that it represented to the country’s democratic institutions. Ultimately, the vital importance of preserving democracy and harmony in relations with Congress and the judiciary prevailed. Lula’s firm commitment and abilities to promote dialogue with the different political forces will be vital to uniting the population to the maximum extent possible. His pursuit for a coalition with the parties in the so-called ‘center’ will be of paramount importance for carrying out his campaign pledge for sustainable economic growth with fiscal responsibility along with social policies that will eradicate hunger, promote inclusion of minorities and provide effective education and health programs. Moreover, Lula is fully committed to conservation and responsible management of the country’s biodiversity, particularly in the Amazon rainforest, aiming for zero deforestation. He is also determined to restore the country’s pre-eminent position in its foreign relations and active support to multilateral organizations. We should expect Brazil to resume a proactive and constructive role in its ties with other countries, aiming at fostering trade, investment and cooperation in science and technology. Notwithstanding Bolsonaro’s difficulties in acknowledging defeat, the transition to the new government-elect will move forward, although with challenges to securing a proper and orderly collaboration with the new team. Lula will count on the support of well-known political leaders, a highly regarded team of economists and private-sector leaders. Unlike the current concentration of power under the Economy Ministry, the economic team is expected to be expanded with the possible restoration of cabinet-level members whom Bolsonaro’s administration eliminated and, as already announced, with the reinstatement of the Council of Economic Development. Lula’s style and openness for dialogue with all sectors of Brazilian society is expected to reflect positively in the confidence level of investors and consumers.”
Melvyn Levitsky, professor of international policy and practice at the University of Michigan’s Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy and former U.S. ambassador to Brazil: “Lula has attained almost mythical status among the lower-middle and lower classes in Brazil. His rise from poverty to trade union leader to president of Brazil in addition to popular programs to keep kids in school and assist working families seem to have canceled out the charges and acts of corruption by Workers’ Party (PT) officials. Lula will have to overcome the lack of a majority in the Brazilian Congress. He will certainly have difficulty moving legislation through Congress. Bolsonaro’s response may well be to stimulate his supporters to oppose anything Lula proposes, looking toward the next presidential election in which he will certainly be a candidate. A major question: will he go the next step and encourage violence in the wake of his defeat? At a minimum, gridlock would seem to be on the horizon.”
Beatrice Rangel, member of the Advisor board and director of AMLA Consulting in Miami Beach: “Alexis de Tocqueville’s spirit must have inspired voters in Brazil’s elections. For the first time in the country’s history, there will be a system of checks and balances. Indeed, while Lula clearly won the presidency, Congress will be controlled by the right wing. And this perhaps is Bolsonaro’s legacy. Before his successful bid for the presidency, the Brazilian right was fractured. He managed to bring it together through the establishment of a new political force, the Liberal Party, which served as a platform to coalesce with other groups, including those that are part of the evangelical churches in Brazil. His right-wing Liberal Party (PL) won 99 seats in the 513-member lower house, up from 77, and right-leaning parties allied with Bolsonaro now control half the chamber. In the Senate, his coalition won 13 of the 27 seats that were up for election this year. By divine intervention, one of the newly elected senators is Sergio Moro, who would never accept any democratic backsliding from either Lula or Bolsonaro—the two political titans who emerged from this democratic competition.”
Nicholas Borges, political analyst at BMJ Consultores Associados: “Lula’s small margin of victory was expected because of high polarization. The result reflects a tug-of-war between anti-Bolsonaro and anti-Lula voters, with the first camp winning. Lula inherits a polarized country and will start his administration with high disapproval ratings. The more right-wing-oriented Congress will challenge the president-elect, forcing him to focus on a more pragmatic agenda and leave aside the more left-wing plans of the Workers’ Party (PT). Lula will have to engage in dialogue with centrist parties to achieve governability, but in his previous administration, he showed efficiency in building pragmatic alliances with other parts of the political spectrum. Some demonstrations against the election results may happen. Still, the risks of institutional rupture are low because most of the political class may not support such mobilizations. Lula’s early challenges will be, first, approval of the 2023 budget (despite not yet being in office, the president-elect will negotiate with Congress a favorable budget for his administration), second, the maintenance of Auxílio Brasil payments at 600 reais despite little leeway in public accounts, and third, the fate of the secret budget, which was essential for governability during Bolsonaro’s administration. The president-elect also supports a new fiscal control mechanism to replace the expenditure ceiling, which limits public debt in Brazil. He has not described details about that, but we may know the new proposal in the coming days.”
The Latin America Advisor features Q&A from leaders in politics, economics, and finance every business day. It is available to members of the Dialogue’s Corporate Program and others by subscription.
What should we expect from a newly powerful Brazil? Does the country have the capacity and leadership to be a central actor in addressing critical global and regional problems?
President Lula da Silva triumphantly announced that he and his Turkish counterpart had persuaded Iran to shift a major part of its uranium enrichment program overseas—an objective that had previously eluded the US and other world powers. Washington, however, was not applauding.
An upcoming meeting between Presidents Obama and Rousseff should not be expected to produce dramatic news or unexpected major breakthroughs.