The proportion of Brazilian families in debt climbed to a record 80.4 percent in March, according to a long-running survey by the National Confederation of Commerce (CNC), and household debt reached 49.9 percent of the total credit in the country’s financial system in February, the central bank said on April 27. The issue has gained prominence in Brasília, where President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has expressed concern about rising debt burdens. What is driving the rise in household debt in Brazil? What political consequences could stem from higher levels of indebtedness? How is the government responding to the increase in household debt?
Lena Lavinas, professor at the Institute of Economics at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro: “Household financial debt in Brazil has followed an exponential growth trajectory since Lula’s first administration. In 2003, payroll-deducted credit (crédito consignado) was introduced, allowing the collateralization of social benefits (pensions and safety nets) and the wages of public employees—covering around 50 million people today. These are categories whose income, paid by the state, becomes collateral for banks, enabling access to a special line of credit at interest rates lower than those of standard consumer loans. Repayment is secured through automatic monthly deductions of up to 45 percent of borrowers’ benefits or wages. This mechanism was extended to formal private-sector workers in 2025, under Lula’s third administration, using a mandatory savings fund—accessible in case of dismissal—as collateral. Today, Brazilian households commit 29.7 percent of their monthly income to repaying financial debt, not including arrears on utilities and retail credit. The government’s rationale in promoting this financial inclusion was to stimulate domestic consumption. In practice, however, with very low wages, high interest rates (58.5 percent annually for consumer credit, compared to inflation of 4.5 percent), and a high cost of living—especially with public tariffs rising well above inflation—debt has become an unavoidable means of survival. This is evidenced by the fact that debt management itself has become a novel social policy, through programs such as Desenrola I and II, introduced during Lula’s current term as president. The government aims to reduce default rates and reintegrate borrowers into the financial system, thereby safeguarding bank profitability. There is no policy aimed at ending chronic indebtedness. As a result, the government remains politically vulnerable, effectively indebted to an electorate aware that, without borrowing, the vast majority of the population cannot make ends meet in Brazil.”
Mariano Machado, principal analyst for the Americas at Verisk Maplecroft: “Brazil has more credit cards than people, and that is now becoming a problem for Lula. Jobs and wages look good on paper, but too much household income is now going straight into repayments, with central bank data putting debt service at a record 29.7 percent of income. The problem is not just that Brazilians are borrowing more; it is that they are borrowing through expensive credit lines, with unsecured credit still costing 61.5 percent a year. Defaults are highest where families’ money runs short: 63.5 percent on revolving cards, 16.5 percent on overdrafts and 13 percent on installment card debt. That explains Lula’s attempt to put money back into voters’ monthly budgets before October elections. The Desenrola II debt relief initiative is designed to move quickly, targeting individuals earning up to five times the minimum wage and focusing on overdue credit card, overdraft and personal loan debts. This could deliver visible relief if it lowers monthly repayments and clears arrears quickly, but it is not a structural fix. With Lula holding only a narrow first-round lead and runoff polling effectively a dead heat, how voters feel about their bank balances now matters more than the government’s macro-economic story. Rising indebtedness weakens Lula’s ability to convert jobs and wages into approval ratings, giving the opposition a clear anti-incumbent line: The economy may look better in Brasília and in the markets, but families are still financially squeezed. For businesses, the risk is a consumer market that looks resilient overall but becomes weaker, more credit-dependent and more cautious at the checkout.”
Christopher Garman, managing director for the Americas at Eurasia Group: “Brazilian household debt has reached record levels because of broader credit access since the pandemic, high interest rates and still-strained household finances. Even with labor market gains and higher average income, the cost of living has risen, while inflation in services and essentials, especially food, continues to squeeze budgets. Many families therefore remain dependent on expensive credit, including credit cards, overdraft facilities and personal loans. The rapid spread of online betting platforms has added pressure for more vulnerable consumers. With public approval weakened, the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is likely to respond with a new debt renegotiation program focused initially on households. The plan will probably seek to replace expensive debt with cheaper credit backed by public guarantees. Its core design resembles Desenrola, Lula’s highest-rated economic initiative, which explains the Planalto’s decision to pursue another round of relief. The political objective is clear. The administration wants to improve public sentiment on the economy in an election year, especially among lower-income voters who are more exposed to debt stress. The government also expects to benefit from earlier consumer-focused measures, including the new rules that expanded the income range for Minha Casa, Minha Vida beneficiaries on April 22. Even so, the initiative repeats a key weakness of the earlier program. The government is again prioritizing short-term relief without advancing a structural agenda to reduce over-indebtedness over time. The measure may ease immediate pressure and provide some support for consumption, but it will not solve the underlying problem. If the benefits prove modest, the opposition will likely argue that Lula is managing the crisis rather than resolving it ahead of the October elections.”
Carmem Feijó, professor at Fluminense Federal University:“Household debt is at the center of economic and political debate in Brazil at the moment. While aggregate indicators suggest stability, the daily experience of families is one of hardship. In 2025, credit to individuals grew to reach 35 percent of GDP, while indebtedness rose from 48.3 percent to 49.7 percent of disposable income. This phenomenon is not recent. Since the 2000s, credit has become a structural element of the Brazilian economy, boosting consumption, but also reflecting a process of financialization of daily life, amplified by innovations such as fintechs. Indebtedness began, especially from the mid-2010s onward, to compensate for income stagnation and the fragility of the labor market. More than the volume of debt, it is also straining the growing financial fragility of families, marked by the high commitment of income, the instability of income sources and the worsening quality of credit. More expensive and short-term modalities, such as revolving credit, have gained ground, increasing the risk of default. This risk intensified after 2021, with an increase in income commitment to debt, which rose from 27.4 percent in 2024 to 29.2 percent in 2025. Given this, the challenge for public policy is twofold: to promote mechanisms for debt relief and reorganization—with adjustments to the over-indebtedness law and renegotiation programs—and to address the structural dimension of the problem, aggravated by high interest rates. How this issue will be addressed is central to the well-being of families and the political environment, since domestic financial health has become one of the main barometers of social perception of the economy.”
The Latin America Advisor features Q&A from leaders in politics, economics, and finance every business day. It is available to members of the Dialogue’s Corporate Program and others by subscription.
