Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was convicted Sept. 11 by a supreme court panel on charges that he oversaw a coup plot to remain in office following his failed re-election bid in 2022. Bolsonaro, who was found guilty along with seven co-defendants, was sentenced to 27 years and three months in prison, though he is expected to appeal. What do the case and conviction say about the state of democracy and the rule of law in Brazil? What precedent does it set? What does the conviction mean for Brazil’s polarized political climate, and how might it affect the country’s relationship with the United States?
Mariano Machado, Americas principal analyst at Verisk Maplecroft: “The ruling underscores Brazil’s institutional resilience yet leaves the country navigating a rougher political and diplomatic landscape. The weight of the charges makes reversal improbable, leaving amnesty as Bolsonaro’s last escape hatch. His allies in the Centrão continue to push a House bill that would absolve all defendants in democracy-related cases since 2019—an unpopular initiative, but one they see as survival politics. Although Bolsonaro himself may be politically finished, Bolsonarismo is anything but. The center-right now faces a test: splinter under competing claims of loyalty or coalesce behind a successor capable of courting Bolsonaro’s base without his baggage. São Paulo Governor Tarcísio de Freitas, who burnished his credentials with a pro-amnesty speech, has moved to the front of the pack. In turn, street politics remain volatile. Right-wing networks have shown organizational muscle in recent rallies and are planning more, while security services monitor pockets of sympathy within military police units. Brazil’s institutions have held, but pressure on the streets will test their staying power. Across the hemisphere, the verdict reverberates. Some hail it as proof of democratic accountability; others warn that bans on pardons, by removing exit ramps, risk prolonging unrest. The hemispheric argument over lawfare and ‘judicial coups’ is unlikely to end here. Connectedly, the conviction pushes the bilateral relationship with the United States into uncharted waters. Talk of retaliation has surfaced, though the White House’s room for tariff escalation is limited by inflationary pressures on key commodities.”
Gabrielle Trebat, managing director for Brazil and the Southern Cone at McLarty Associates: “With last week’s conviction, Jair Bolsonaro has become the fifth Brazilian head of state to face impeachment or imprisonment since the return of democracy in 1988. As the concurring justices noted in their arguments, the ruling was historic in upholding Brazil’s commitment to democracy given the country’s history with coups d’état. That said, Bolsonaro and his allies intend to pursue appeals, annulments and amnesties, so in reality the conviction will likely not be a conclusive chapter, but rather another episode in the trend of political contestation that has legally embroiled figures across the partisan spectrum. Throughout the trial, pro-Bolsonaro demonstrators have adopted the American flag as a political symbol, and senior U.S. officials affirmed their support in return with President Trump, Secretary Rubio, Deputy Secretary of State Chris Landau and others rebuking the court’s decision and threatening a U.S. response. This solidarity with the convicted former president signals that the U.S.-Brazil relationship has become ever more personalized and politicized in the era of Trump and Bolsonaro. In the short term, this dynamic could expose Brazil to sharper U.S. tariffs and/or additional sanctions, in turn raising the possibilities for Brazilian retaliation, even as the Lula administration continues to advocate for a negotiated trade solution with Washington. If the measures further escalate tensions, the U.S.-Brazil relationship may become a partisan issue driving a deeper wedge between political factions in Brazil’s 2026 presidential election.”
Rubens Barbosa, former ambassador of Brazil to the United States: “For the first time in Brazilian history, people involved in a violent attempt against democracy and the rule of law were put on trial in the supreme court. This is a precedent that cannot be ignored. A former president and high-ranking members of the armed forces and civilians were found guilty and convicted. This decision shows the strength of the institutions, of the democratic system and of the rule of law in Brazil. Without any pronouncement and any undemocratic reaction from the armed forces, the decision is even more important if we consider the division and polarization of Brazilian society as has also happened in the United States. The striking similarities between the violent attempts to change the result of an election both in the United States and in Brazil should be noted especially in light of the different political consequences after the elections in both countries. If the United States imposes new trade sanctions, companies in both the United States and Brazil will be affected, and we cannot rule out the possibility of a serious political and diplomatic impact on bilateral relations. Radical ideological and political measures against Brazil by the Trump administration may produce results contrary to the interests of both nations.”
Giulia Branco Spiess, senior program associate at the Brazil Program of the Inter-American Dialogue: “The conviction of former President Jair Bolsonaro is a historic moment for Brazil’s democracy. For the first time, a former head of state and senior military officials have been held legally accountable for plotting to undermine the constitutional order. The ruling shows that attempts to subvert democracy in Brazil can face real consequences. At the same time, the case reflects deeper institutional challenges, as the very fact that a coup attempt was orchestrated shows that institutions had not been working properly and left room for authoritarian maneuvers. Since the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff in 2016, Brazil has faced growing political instability. Congress has often failed to fulfill its role, creating a vacuum in which the judiciary—especially the supreme court—has had to expand its actions. During Bolsonaro’s presidency, the court intervened to stop measures that threatened democratic norms, such as Bolsonaro’s attempts to ease gun laws or limit social protections during the Covid-19 pandemic. Thus, it is clear, from an institutional perspective, that the supreme court played an important role in protecting democracy when other checks and balances allowed for authoritarian drift. Yet what will happen in the future regarding judicial activism is something that will need to be reassessed, as the court cannot permanently substitute for political institutions. Politically, the decision adds to polarization and opens a new phase of realignment among political forces. Bolsonaro remains an influential figure, even as his movement shows divisions. Possible successors, such as São Paulo Governor Tarcísio de Freitas, will have to navigate Bolsonaro’s continuing influence. At the same time, attention is already turning to the 2026 presidential elections, with Bolsonaro’s family, especially his sons, as a key factor representing the movement’s more radical wing and also influencing Brazil-U.S. relations. The conviction adds strain to that relationship. President Donald Trump and his allies have portrayed Bolsonaro as a victim of political persecution. In this context, further escalation is likely, and an expansion of Magnitsky sanctions to other supreme court justices is already expected.”
The Latin America Advisor features Q&A from leaders in politics, economics, and finance every business day. It is available to members of the Dialogue’s Corporate Program and others by subscription.
