Orozco: “In the case of Nicaragua, in particular, the main determinant that drives people out is political”

This post is also available in: Español

In an interview with Esta Semana and Confidencial, Manuel Orozco, director of the Migration, Remittances, and Development program at the Inter-American Dialogue, spoke with Carlos F. Chamorro about the future of the remittance trends, migration from Nicaragua, the Nicaraguan economy, and the future of the Ortega regime.

Comments from Orozco:

“The average number or amounts of remittances sent per person has not grown substantially. What has grown is the relative share, with regards to earlier periods, of migrants who have gone to the United States and are sending remittances.”

“However, in general, a migrant doesn’t have decision-making power because he or she leaves the administration of the money to the receiving household. Out of respect for the management of the household of the family member you are sending money to, you place your trust in your family member to use the money responsibly. And secondly, it’s a very big responsibility to manage two households – the migrant’s household and the remittance recipient’s household. You are aware of the economic needs of the household, you know that people are not going out partying every day to spend money on other things, and your relatives recognize that you are sweating it out in this country, because here, if you don’t work you don’t eat.”

“The regime has the resources to sustain itself economically for at least two more years under these conditions. At this moment Nicaragua is paying the equivalent of 75 percent of what it is borrowing. So it would not have the capacity to fiscally sustain itself the way the model was operating. Remittances have come to solve the problem and in a way what they are doing is extending a capacity for sustainability. Still, we are talking about the sustainability of the regime, of the State, not of the country.”

[…]

READ THE FULL INTERVIEW IN CONFIDENCIAL

COMENTARIOS DE TARACIUK BRONER:

Q & A:

Q

¿Qué tan válido ves tú — o legítimo — el temor que reporta la Casa Blanca de que aumente la migración haitiana?

A

“Una política de seguridad que funcione debe tener dos pilares: una visión punitivista donde quien comete un delito vaya preso, pero con debido proceso y bajo investigaciones por un poder judicial independiente y, por otro lado, una serie de políticas que sean más sociales y preventivas que eviten la comisión del delito.” 

View Video Clip

Key Findings

Suggested Content

Prat-Gay: “Neither can the United States succeed without the rest of the continent, nor Latin America navigating with its back turned to the United States”

Alfonso Prat-Gay, board member and Co-Chair of the Inter-American Dialogue, joined Carlos Pagni on Odisea Argentina.

Q&A with Igor Patrick: “The dispute over who processes Brazilian rare earths—not who digs them—will define whether this moment becomes strategic autonomy or just another commodity boom.”

This Q&A is part of the Brazil Program's ongoing efforts to examine the evolving geopolitical and economic dynamics shaping Brazil's role in global supply chains,

Santos: “The era of sweeping tariffs is here to stay, and the private sector will increasingly begin pricing in U.S. tariff risk.”

In an interview with O Globo, Bruna Santos, director of the Brazil Program, discussed the broader implications of the Trump administration’s tariff strategy, arguing that

The Inter-American Dialogue MEXICO Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required

The Inter-American Dialogue BRAZIL Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required

Subscribe To
Latin America Advisors

* indicates required field

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The Inter-American Dialogue Education Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required