How Foresight Could Strengthen Governance in Latin America

The Dialogue’s long-term global trends program aims to increase Latin America’s exposure to the growing use of foresight and strategic thinking, in order to improve decision-making today. In cooperation with the Inter-American Development Bank, the Dialogue’s initiative provides governments, banks and corporations, universities, think tanks, and other institutions in Latin America fresh, continued access to vital information and analyses on relevant trends and future scenarios, with the goal to strengthen the region’s own capacity to conduct and disseminate similar studies.

This newsletter from the Global Trends Project seeks to identify how foresight could strengthen governance in Latin America. 

Achieving Better Outcomes in Latin American Countries

Foresight analysis also helps to identify strategic areas for building a better future. Four goals are worth mentioning: 

  • Attain social inclusion.
  • A transformation of the productive base.
  • A new role for the State and new market regulations.
  • Increased national and international dialogue.

Main findings from our report include the following: 

  • Politics has a critical role in communicating a new vision, identifying main challenges and signaling a road ahead. 
  • The analysis of global trends, drivers and game changes provides political actors with the tools to articulate a narrative and a long-term strategy of action. 
  • The spread of ideas about the futures helps to gain political support. Citizens should be consulted and they should have access to mechanisms that influence decision-making. 
  • A seed must be planted in all major government institutions, private sector and labor organizations, universities and regions. The aim is to disseminate new ways of thinking about the future. 
  • A good organization should include members from the executive branch (presidential or prime minister level, and ministries), Parliament, regions and provinces, universities and companies. Canada, Australia, France and Singapore offer useful examples for Latin America. Finland is one of the best examples. 
  • Latin American countries should create a unit or agency alongside the presidency. This central government agency must be organized as an advisory body rather than a ministry. 
  • Public-private task forces are more stable and less exposed to sudden changes that occur when ministers are removed or a new president is elected. Public-private engagement could provide ongoing advice and proposals. 

 

Learn more about the Dialogue’s work on Global Trends

Suggested Content

Formación de liderazgo escolar: programas pioneros en Estados Unidos

En el contexto de numerosas refor­mas educativas que apuntan a la descentralización, autonomía esco­lar, mayor responsabilidad por los resultados de parte de las escuelas, focalización

The US & Central America’s Northern Tier

Organized crime, rampant corruption, and large scale violence have gravely stunted Central America's economic and social development.

Prosperity and Progress in Intermediate Cities: Making Development Impacts through Remittances

On January 12, 2024, the Inter-American Dialogue released the report "Prosperity and Progress in Intermediate Cities: Making Development Impacts through Remittances." The report, produced by

The Inter-American Dialogue MEXICO Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required

The Inter-American Dialogue BRAZIL Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required

Subscribe To
Latin America Advisors

* indicates required field

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The Inter-American Dialogue Education Program

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER / SUSCRÍBASE A NUESTRO BOLETÍN:

* indicates required